Week 7 – Reading 1

Confessions of an Intellectual (Property)

In this reading McLeod discusses outdated intellectual property laws in relation to mash-ups. Using Danger Mouse’s The Grey Album as an example, he shows how mash-ups are not just the two or more elements involved, but an entirely new piece of music. He mentions, regarding mash-ups, that “as a form of creativity, they are quite limited and limiting. First, because they depend on the recognizability of the original, mashups are circumscribed to a relatively narrow repertoire of Top 40 pop songs.” I disagree strongly with this because a mash-up should not have to rely on people recognising the original songs. When two songs are mashed up, a new piece of music is created, so recognising the two original pieces is only relevant if the listener wishes to deconstruct the mash-up and separate it into it’s original elements. I am currently working on a piece of music which combines samples from a Requiem by a lesser known French composer with a slowed down breakbeat, and the result is a lush hip hop track which absolutely does not rely on recognising the original pieces in order to enjoy the music.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Week 7 – Reading 1

  1. Pingback: Reflections on Group Blog Posts « Rmitmusic Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s